https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Water, water … well, not quite as nowhere as before

A couple of weeks of rainy weather (all part of the Grand Air Conditioning Conspiracy) has boosted the reservoirs in the area, leading Denver Water to add a third watering…

A couple of weeks of rainy weather (all part of the Grand Air Conditioning Conspiracy) has boosted the reservoirs in the area, leading Denver Water to add a third watering day for people.

Well, kinda.

The board emphasized, however, the third day was meant to give people flexibility in choosing which days to water. If they water all three days, the board warned, it could push them over the 18,000 gallon two-month limit, and stiff surcharges would kick in.

In other words, you can water more often, but not more.

Board president Denise Maes voted against the proposal, saying recent storms raised reservoir levels a bit but rather than rewarding consumers now, she felt the board should continue its long-term plan to conserve water with an eye on what may happen in the future if the drought remains.

Probably how I would have voted as well. Of course, a cynic might think that this might end up boosting Denver Water’s revenue (from fines, if not just from water use), and that was the real reason …

Moses and the Ten E-Mails

“Excuse me, Sir.” IS THAT YOU AGAIN, MOSES? “I’m afraid it is, Sir.” WHAT IS IT THIS TIME, MOSES? MORE COMPUTER PROBLEMS? “How did you guess?” I DON’T HAVE TO…

“Excuse me, Sir.”

IS THAT YOU AGAIN, MOSES?

“I’m afraid it is, Sir.”

WHAT IS IT THIS TIME, MOSES? MORE COMPUTER PROBLEMS?

“How did you guess?”

I DON’T HAVE TO GUESS, MOSES. REMEMBER?

“Oh, yeah. I forgot.”

TELL ME WHAT YOU WANT, MOSES.

“But you already know, Sir. Remember?”

MOSES!

“Sorry, Sir. Well, I, uh, have a question, Sir. You know those ten ‘things’ you sent me via e-mail?”

YOU MEAN THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, MOSES?

“That’s it. I was wondering if they’re, um, important.”

WHAT DO YOU MEAN, ‘IF THEY ARE IMPORTANT,’ MOSES? OF COURSE THEY’RE IMPORTANT. OTHERWISE I WOULDN’T HAVE SENT THEM TO YOU.

Uh, yeah, well, sorry, Sir, but I, um, lost them. I could say the dog ate them, but, of course, you would see right through that.”

WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU ‘LOST THEM?’ ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL ME YOU DIDN’T SAVE THEM, MOSES?

“No, Sir. I, um, forgot.”

SAVING IS VERY IMPORTANT MOSES. I’VE TOLD YOU THAT BEFORE.

“Yes, I know. Saving. Yes. Well, I was going to save them, but I, uh, forgot, and then I couldn’t find them and … well, I did forward them to some people before I lost them.”

AND DID YOU HEAR BACK FROM ANY OF THEM?

“You already know I did. There was the one guy who said he never uses ‘shalt not.’ May he change the words a little bit?”

YES, MOSES, AS LONG AS HE DOES NOT CHANGE THE MEANING.

“And what about the guy who thought your stance was a little harsh, and recommended calling them the ‘Ten Suggestions,’ or letting people pick one or two to try for a while?”

MOSES, I WILL ACT AS THOUGH I DID NOT HEAR THAT.

“I think that means ‘no.’ Well, what about the guy who said I was scamming him?”

I THINK THE TERM IS ‘SPAMMING,’ MOSES.

“Oh, yeah, right. Well, I e-mailed him back and told him I don’t even eat that stuff, per Your orders, Sir, and I have no idea how you can send it to someone through a computer.”

AND WHAT DID HE SAY?

“You know what he said. He used Your name in vain. You don’t think he might have sent me one of those — err — plagues, and that’s the reason I lost those ten ‘things’, do you?”

THEY ARE NOT PLAGUES. THEY ARE CALLED ‘VIRUSES,’ MOSES.

“Whatever! This computer stuff is just too much for me. Can we go back to those stone tablets? It was hard on my back taking them out and reading them each day, but at least I never lost them.”

WE WILL DO IT THE NEW WAY, MOSES, USING COMPUTERS.

“I was afraid you would say that, Sir.”

MOSES, WHAT DID I TELL YOU TO DO IF YOU MESSED UP?

“You told me to hold up this rat and point it toward the computer.”

IT’S A MOUSE, MOSES, NOT A RAT. MOUSE. MOUSE. SO, DID YOU DO THAT?

“No, I decided to try calling technical support first. After all, who knows more about this stuff than you? And I really like your hours. By the way, Sir, did Noah have two of these mice on the ark?”

NO, MOSES.

“One other thing. Why did you not name them ‘frogs’ instead of ‘mice,’ because did you not tell me the thing they sit on is a pad?”

I DID NOT NAME THEM, MOSES. MAN DID, AND YOU CAN CALL YOURS A FROG IF YOU WANT TO.

“Oh, that explains it. I bet some woman told Adam to call it a mouse. After all, was it not a woman who named one of the computers ‘Apple?'”

SAY GOOD NIGHT, MOSES.

“Wait a minute, Sir. I am pointing the mouse, and it seems to be working. Yes, a couple of the ten ‘things’ have come back into my e-mail from other people.”

WHICH ONES ARE THEY, MOSES?

“Let me see. ‘Thou shalt not steal from any grave an image’ and ‘Thou shalt not uncover Thy neighbor’s wife.’ And something about making your exodus to the burning bush longer, harder, and more exciting …”

*SIGH* TURN OFF THE COMPUTER, MOSES. I’M SENDING YOU ANOTHER SET OF STONE TABLETS.

(via my folks, plus a few tweaks by me)

Catastrophic Photoshop Malfunction

Heh. The folks putting together a Fox News splash screen advertising a segment about the Prevalence of Evil Internet Porn very carefully blurred the exposed breast in the screen shot…

Heh. The folks putting together a Fox News splash screen advertising a segment about the Prevalence of Evil Internet Porn very carefully blurred the exposed breast in the screen shot of a porn site they used. They just, um, managed to not spot other, more penetrating portions of the pic. (Warning: NSFW, if someone’s watching carefully.)

Oh, yeah — somebody in the Art Department is going to be getting a good talking to over that.

(via Les)

WIST-o-the-Day

“An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn’t happen today.” — Lawrence J. Peter (c. 1925-1990)…

“An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn’t happen today.”

— Lawrence J. Peter (c. 1925-1990)

Letter-writing

Post up the most recent versions of quote-by-authors-whose-last-names-begin-with-the-letters A-F in my WIST quotations database. Yee-hah….

Post up the most recent versions of quote-by-authors-whose-last-names-begin-with-the-letters A-F in my WIST quotations database. Yee-hah.

Conversation Starter

Another new blog meme: I want you to ask me something in comments you think you should know about me. Something that should be obvious, but you have no idea…

Another new blog meme:

I want you to ask me something in comments you think you should know about me. Something that should be obvious, but you have no idea about. (Then post this same question in your LJ/blog and find out what people don’t know about you …)

I don’t promise to answer every question, but, heck, go ahead and ask.

(via Rey)

Disclosure

How much information is Too Much Information? John Kerry has ruled out opening up records of his 1988 divorce. “It’s history, ancient history. My ex-wife and I are terrific friends,…

How much information is Too Much Information?

John Kerry has ruled out opening up records of his 1988 divorce.

“It’s history, ancient history. My ex-wife and I are terrific friends, very proud of our children. We have stayed close through those years as an extended family,” the Massachusetts senator said, adding, “It’s none of anybody’s business, period.”

We’ve been through this bit before, and no doubt will again: what information about someone’s private life is worthwhile knowing for the public when voting for someone? Or, put the other way around, what information isn’t worthwhile?

Since my own divorce was pretty amicable, as such things go, there wouldn’t be any skeletons in that closet, should I suddenly find myself running for President. On the other hand, I’d still resent having that information opened up to prying eyes.

On the other hand, if you’re running for President, “if you can’t stand the heat, don’t try to go into the kitchen.” As the past decades have shown, any potential private weaknesses or vulnerabilities or scandels will come back to haunt you over your term. In some ways it’s better to get them out in the open, up front, and put them behind you, then fight a lengthy, ultimately fruitless battle, which only magnifies the “importance” when the records are finally opened up.

(And if they’re never opened up — well, that’s just grist for the conspiracy mills, right?)

Kerry uses as a defense that he and his ex are good friends, and neither presumably want to have the records opened up. That didn’t wash for the Ryans, neither of whom wanted those records opened up — and once they were ordered open by the courts, it certainly ended a political career.

But it was all 15-plus years ago, right? What’s the relevance? Well, heck, folks keep poking and prodding at what Dubya was doing two or three or four decades ago. Clinton’s past follies were simlarly on forced display. I don’t know that’s all a good thing, but it’s certainly a precedent.

I don’t know that there’s anything horribly embarrassing in those divorce papers. I even suspect probably not, beyond just recollections of the event itself. But Kerry’s attempt to stonewall releasing of the records can only pique interest in them, which is a distraction neither he — nor the electorate — particularly need right now. Previous stonewalling about the personal past by his opponent should certainly demonstrate that poit.

GMail

I got a GMail account just before we headed out to California (thanks, Fred), but haven’t really gotten into as of yet. But if I ever do, GTray will be…

I got a GMail account just before we headed out to California (thanks, Fred), but haven’t really gotten into as of yet.

But if I ever do, GTray will be an essential part of using it. It sits in your system tray and alerts you when mail has come into your GMail account. Cool.

(via Seki)

“Fortune and glory, kid!”

So Margie got an e-mail from a food company who’s product she mentioned in her recipe blog, offering to link to her recipe if she linked directly to them in…

So Margie got an e-mail from a food company who’s product she mentioned in her recipe blog, offering to link to her recipe if she linked directly to them in the recipe.

Too cool.

Now I just need to hound her to post more foody goodness there more often. Yum!

The Mystery Solved

On Quebec, on the other side of C-470, there’s been … something building. It’s the third incarnation for the building, and they’ve been building extensively on it for months now…

On Quebec, on the other side of C-470, there’s been … something building.

It’s the third incarnation for the building, and they’ve been building extensively on it for months now — as it turns out, popping the top to create seating on the rooftop.

What’s been missing has been any indication of what the heck is going in there. No sign.

Well, I finally drove past the front. And the Construction!Danger!NoTrespassing! sign says, “Owner: LoDo’s Bar & Grill,” which seems to be these guys.

Well, thank heavens — there was a huge shortage of sports bars down here. In that one block, anyway.

Hmmm. Actually, they have a website of their own, for their restaurant downtowm (as well as for their ownership group). And — oh, boy, they have a Model Search every Thursday night! Wow! Just the place I’m jonesing to go! No doubt it’s a tradition that will be brought to their new location (opening Summer 2004).

Oh, well, at least they’re …

… oh, hey, and it looks like they’re great neighbors, too! They’ve been busy suing any similar business downtown using the name “LoDo” in their name. Not that they originated the name, mind you, but they trademarked it. So, even though everyone calls the Lower Downtown area “LoDo” (indeed, I think there are Official City Signs to that effect), anyone who uses that in their business that might cause confusion (i.e., another restaurant or bar or even a B&B) is subject to lawsuits.

Oh, boy. Wonder if they’ll call themselves the Highlands Ranch Bar & Grill and then sue anyone who uses that geographical moniker.

(Actually, I can’t find any reference to this story after 1999. No idea how it worked out. Except that all the businesses still seem to be in business under their own names.)

All in all, a wonderful new business to come to our community. I’m just thrilled.

The CAN-SPY Act?

What did Congress do when folks started getting persnicketty about spam problems? Pass the CANSPAM Act, which both legalized certain (still irkstome) forms of spam and preempted state laws on…

What did Congress do when folks started getting persnicketty about spam problems? Pass the CANSPAM Act, which both legalized certain (still irkstome) forms of spam and preempted state laws on the subject. The result was — well, how much less spam are you getting today than a year ago?

So Congress is now busy getting in a big uproar about spyware on PCs. The result, some fear, may be legitimizing spyware from big commercial vendors while not doing a heck of a lot to the folks who are already breaking the law.

And, of course, it will preempt any state laws on the subject. Swell.

H.R. 2929, currently called the Spy Act, is moving through the House so fast it’s hard to keep track of what it says. The version now headed to the House floor (after being approved by the same House committee that approved what became Can Spam) does at least have a requirement that the user be notified in plain English what the spyware/adware does. Unfortunately, it also very pointedly pre-empts the much stronger Utah law. Even worse is the fact that it leaves enforcement solely to the FTC, even though FTC officials have made it clear they have neither the will nor the means to go after any but the most criminal offenders.
It’s a good bet that, once the lobbyists are finished with it, the Spy Act will read more like the Sneakwrap-Sanctioned Spyware Protection Act. Software industry lobbyists are already attacking the law’s rather mild notice-and-consent requirement as being too burdensome. In fact, organizations that have long championed the sneakwrap licensing approach now claim they are trying to save users from having to read too many notices. For example, the Business Software Alliance issued a statement saying the notices the bill mandates won’t allow consumers to distinguish between legitimate vendors and the bad actors. “We are concerned that the ‘one size fits all’ notices approach will not help to inform consumers about how their personal information is being used, and will become just another screen to click ‘I agree.'” BSA CEO Robert Holleyman said in the statement.
I can’t begin to tell you how ironic it is for someone who watched UCITA’s creation to hear the BSA argue that users should not be required to mindlessly click OK.

Potter

The title of the next HP book (Number 6) has been announced by JK Rowling: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. And, no, I haven’t finished Book 4 yet…

The title of the next HP book (Number 6) has been announced by JK Rowling: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince.

And, no, I haven’t finished Book 4 yet …

What the fuss is about

For those who want to catch a bit of Fahrenheit 9/11, but don’t want to toss money into Michael Moore’s coffers (or, conversely, for anyone who wants to refer to…

For those who want to catch a bit of Fahrenheit 9/11, but don’t want to toss money into Michael Moore’s coffers (or, conversely, for anyone who wants to refer to arguments and assertions made in the flick), someone has placed a transcript (of at least the first 40-odd minutes) of the flick here.

I expect various media legal types will be all over this like a ton of bricks (and with some justification), so view it while you can. Though, of course, if Moore’s really interested in as many people as possible being exposed to and influenced by the assertions in his opus, I’d expect him encourage stuff like this, or at least turn a blind eye to it.

(via Daimnation)

Silver lining

Snipers: good for your side, and good for the environment!…

Snipers: good for your side, and good for the environment!

The Call

Wow! Imagine my surprise when I picked up the phone and John Kerry was on the line, the Man himself, introducing himself, and talking directly to me, just one hapless…

Wow! Imagine my surprise when I picked up the phone and John Kerry was on the line, the Man himself, introducing himself, and talking directly to me, just one hapless citizen (and registered Democrat) here in the great state of Colorado. Imagine!. I tried to get a word in edge-wise, ask some questions, inquire about some issues — but … well, he just wouldn’t stop talking, and telling me to press 1 on my touch-tone phone, over and over again. .

I eventually had to hang up to get him to stop talking. Too bad. Might have been an enlightening conversation.

Trends

Why are kids at a prestigious Connecticut private school so worried about the new version of the SAT and it’s essays? Not because of academic training, but because of lack…

Why are kids at a prestigious Connecticut private school so worried about the new version of the SAT and it’s essays? Not because of academic training, but because of lack of handwriting training.

At Greenwich Country Day, a prestigious Connecticut private school, computers have all but replaced pencil and paper. Typing instruction starts in second grade, and laptops are mandatory by seventh. Essays are typed, and often class notes are, too.
“As an adult in today’s work world, you don’t write anything,” said Carol Maoz, head of the upper school (grades 7-9), adding she couldn’t think of an occasion students would write out a longhand essay. “You type everything. There really is no need for proper handwriting.”
Maybe not — indeed, even notes get passed in class via text message these days.
But next spring, many of Country Day’s alumni, along with millions of other high school juniors, will have to write a very important, 25-minute longhand essay — as part of the new SAT. Nearly as many will write a new optional essay on the ACT.
The new tests are causing general anxiety for the high school class of 2006, guidance counselors report. And some students who think they’ll write a good essay are worried scorers won’t be able to decipher it, raising the question of whether penmanship should be getting more attention in the classroom.

Heh.

Perhaps we’ll hear complaints about how the new SAT discrimnates against rich (or at least technologically well-endowed) kids.

The obvious answer is to come up with a computer-based SAT, though that raises a whole different set of questions, so to speak.

Outta the pool!

Neighborhood pools are running into trouble, both because the aging infrastructure requires more spending to keep it intact, and because, well, nobody wants to swim any more. Surveys by the…

Neighborhood pools are running into trouble, both because the aging infrastructure requires more spending to keep it intact, and because, well, nobody wants to swim any more.

Surveys by the National Sporting Goods Association show a steady decline since the 1980s in the number of Americans participating in recreational swimming: 47 million people ages 7 and older said they went swimming more than once in 2003, compared with 71 million in 1988.
Potential home buyers are also less interested in having an outdoor swimming pool in their developments, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
“In a two-income family, after working a full day, who feels like coming home and packing up the kids to go to the pool when you can come home and sit in your air conditioning?” said Sue Jacoby, board president at Wodenschiere, which had about 500 members and a waiting list when it opened in the 1960s but has dropped to around 200 in the past few years.

Interesting. I can certainly understand the “busy-busy” argument (though not because I prefer to just lounge about in air conditioning), but our neighborhood pool remains pretty packed — and membership fees (it’s private, not public) are pretty steep, which may mean that the people who belong are there because they want to be.

I dunno. I didn’t grow up in a neighborhood with such a pool (pools in SoCal tend to be privately owned in peoples’ back yards, so if you know someone, you get to swim), so I can’t gauge the change over the decades. But it would be a shame to see them go the way of the Dodo.

Rulings

Big flurry of rulings on various Ostensibly Bad People Thrown In Prison cases from the Supreme Court. General conclusion by the Supremes: detention may be okay, detention without recourse to…

Big flurry of rulings on various Ostensibly Bad People Thrown In Prison cases from the Supreme Court. General conclusion by the Supremes: detention may be okay, detention without recourse to the courts is not.

The Padilla case was tossed out on jurisdictional grounds, but Stevens’ dissent (addressing the merits of the case) is worth reading:

Whether respondent is entitled to immediate release is a question that reasonable jurists may answer in different ways. There is, however, only one possible answer to the question whether he is entitled to a hearing on the justification for his detention.
At stake in this case is nothing less than the essence of a free society. Even more important than the method of selecting the people’s rulers and their successors is the character of the constraints imposed on the Executive by the rule of law. Unconstrained Executive detention for the purpose of investigating and preventing subversive activity is the hallmark of the Star Chamber. Access to counsel for the purpose of protecting the citizen from official mistakes and mistreatment is the hallmark of due process.
Executive detention of subversive citizens, like detention of enemy soldiers to keep them off the battlefield, may sometimes be justified to prevent persons from launching or becoming missiles of destruction. It may not, however, be justified by the naked interest in using unlawful procedures to extract information. Incommunicado detention for months on end is such a procedure. Whether the information so procured is more or less reliable than that acquired by more extreme forms of torture is of no consequence. For if this Nation is to remain true to the ideals symbolized by its flag, it must not wield the tools of tyrants even to resist an assault by the forces of tyranny.

Which, on the face of it, at least, seems reasonable to me, at least where US citizens are concerned (and this is echoed in the opinions on the Hamdi case as well, including by folks like Scalia).

The issue of combatants at Gitmo is a bit more problematic, as both the terms of the “war” they were captured in, and the resulting terms by which they are to be judged, are a lot fuzzier. While there has been (very) slow progress in processing those folks and releasing ones not needed to be held, that, in itself, is a difficult thing to determine, and thus the tendancy is simply to keep holding all of them while there’s concern that any of them may constitute an ongoing danger. Unleashing all of that into the federal courts seems problematic to me — but not necessarily more problematic than simply keeping ’em all locked up indefinitely.

(via Stuart Benjamin)

UPDATE: ScotusBLOG’s Lyle Denniston notes:

The Supreme Court’s first review of the Bush administration’s handling of the war on terrorism may force a fundamental reordering of constitutional priorities, especially in the way the government may deal with individuals caught up in that war. Amid all the writing by the Justices in today’s three historic rulings, no sentence stands out as vividly as this one, “A state of war is not a blank check for the President when it comes to the rights of the Nation’s citizens.”
Given the almost limitless claims to presidential power that the administration has been making in court cases and other forums since soon after the September 11, 2001, attacks, that statement – and all that it stands for in the new rulings – must be taken as a severe rebuke.

F3ll0wsh1p of teh R1ng

LOL. It’s The Fellowship of the Ring in gamer-speak. [at the Council of Elrond] Gimli: “dwarves pwn!” Legolas: “Sif, Elves pwn!” Boromir: “OLOLOL noobs, men pwn!” Elrond: “STFU tards!!1!” **Frodo…

LOL. It’s The Fellowship of the Ring in gamer-speak.

[at the Council of Elrond]
Gimli: “dwarves pwn!”
Legolas: “Sif, Elves pwn!”
Boromir: “OLOLOL noobs, men pwn!”
Elrond: “STFU tards!!1!”
**Frodo puts the ring on the plinth
Gimili: “Sif ring pwns all!”
**Gimli swings his axe at it, which shatters
Elrond: “**sigh, noob”

Heh.

(via Les)

Weekend update

We sat at home. Margie was sick. Katherine was cranky. I was not as sick as Margie, nor as cranky as Katherine, but I wasn’t exactly stellar in either category….

We sat at home.

Margie was sick.

Katherine was cranky.

I was not as sick as Margie, nor as cranky as Katherine, but I wasn’t exactly stellar in either category.

I caught up on scanning photos — at least with the couple hundred that were upstairs (vs the several thousand downstairs). I still need to upload the ones to go online, as well as burn some KOA photo discs for them as are interested.

Saturday a.m. I went to our Big Meeting at the Church between the Vestry, the Search Committee, and the Profile Committee, in which the Profile Committee presented their rough draft of the parish profile (which info will go to prospective rectors), and we all demonstrated why trying to get a group of more than 4-5 working on a document at a given time is a forlorn hope. I spent most of the rest of the afternoon writing up some detailed notes to send to the Profile Committee folks. (Bottom line: lot of work went into it, a lot of polishing is still needed, good job, now consider all of this.)

Remarkably enough, I have no church meetings this week. I don’t expect that to repeat until Christmas-time.

As the post below hinted at, we finished up the second season of Coupling (the BBC version, since the US transplant mercifully died before even the first season was over). Triffically funny stuff, sharp, witty, occasionally poignant, most excellent.

We also watched Pirates of the Caribbean, including the Bonus Disc o’ Fine Additions. What I said in my theater review still goes, except that I enjoyed it even more. Solid casting, marvelous attention to detail, a solid mix of both the comedic and the thrilling — it’s all good. And that’s a damn fine sound track, too.