I'm not going to be watching, but if I were, I'd certainly want something like this to entertain/numb me:
Like I said, at the very least you'll be laughing uproariously by the time it's done. Or, alternately, looking for a bridge to jump from.
UPDATE: Well, here's another set of rules.
« Previous FRONT PAGE Next »
Drinking Game rules are a paradox (he says, putting way too much thought into them). You want to:
... give small points to common quirks.
... give big points to uncommon quirks.
... give big points to particularly egregious quirks.
The latter two are sort of like the conflict in the "Run over the pedestrians" game -- do you award big points for running down a jogger (who is a difficult but commonplace) or a granny (who is an easy but outrageous target)? In that game you can get around it for giving "difficulty" points to the former, "style" points to the latter. Not sure how to finesse that in a drinking game, though (beers and shots?).
Man under either version you'll end up stinking!!! Maybe I'll just read it in the paper tomorrow since I'll be at work and don't want to drive home drunk!
Note: This comment space is for discussion of the above topic, and not for unsolicited commercial links. I use SpamLookup and TinyTuring text CAPTCHA to filter out comment spam. If you have technical problems with these measures, please . With or without TypeKey, you'll need to specify an e-mail address, which will not be published or otherwise abused.
Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my wife, my friends, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.