A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me
***Dave Does the Blog

The Post

« Previous  •  FRONT PAGE  •  Next »

Tuesday, 11 January 2005, 11:53 AM
Disclaimer stickers

In keeping with the infamously goofball Cobb County, Georgia, disclaimer stickers to be put on science books that mention (gasp) evolution, here's a collection of several more stickers that you can print out and put on books as well. For example:

This textbook contains material on
gravity. Gravity is a theory, not a fact,
regarding a force that cannot be
directly seen. This material should be
approached with an open mind,
studied carefully, and critically
considered.

Excellent.

(via Respectful Insolence)


Filed under :: Science :: ZT & PC
Link · Print · Edit · TR/G


« Previous  •  FRONT PAGE  •  Next »


Pings?

Trackback ping address: http://www.hill-kleerup.org/blog/mt4/080510t.cgi/6478
Stupid Evil Bastard (11-Jan-05 1:23 PM): More textbook disclaimer stickers.

From the if-you-can't-beat-em-then-mock-em department comes a resource for more textbook disclaimer stickers. It comes in response to school districts such as the one in Cobb County, Georgia where the school board ha...

...


Comments?

Tuesday, 11 January 2005, 4:56 PM
Quoth Rich ...

Speaking as a Christian this is incredibly stupid. The stickers throw down the gauntlet and says prove it (and sadly also gives an opportunity for Christianity to be falsified). The evidence is overwhelming and has been the occasion of many to lose their faith. This is unnecessary because the idea of a young earth is a recent development in Christian theology. Note the following from Shedd in the late 19th Century.

Between the single comprehensive act of the creation of the angels and of chaotic matter mentioned in Gen. 1:1 and the series of divine acts in the six days described in Gen. 1:3–31, an interval of time elapsed. This is the old patristic interpretation. The very common assertion that the church has altered its exegesis, under the compulsion of modern geology, is one of the errors of ignorance. The doctrine of an immense time prior to the six creative days was a common view among the fathers and Schoolmen.

...

Respecting the length of the six creative days, speaking generally, for there was some difference of views, the patristic and medieval exegesis makes them to be long periods, not days of twenty-four hours. The latter interpretation has prevailed only in the modern church. [emphasis mine]

Tuesday, 11 January 2005, 7:59 PM
Quoth dust ...

Who writes this stuff? Arthur Dent?


Speak!

Note: This comment space is for discussion of the above topic, and not for unsolicited commercial links. I use SpamLookup, optional TypeKey registration, and mandatory TinyTuring text CAPTCHA to filter out comment spam. If you have technical problems with these measures, please . With or without TypeKey, you'll need to specify an e-mail address, which will not be published or otherwise abused.




Remember you next time?

Subscribe to this post (e-mail when updated)?





Creative Commons License
Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my wife, my friends, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.