This entry | Main blog

***Dave Does the Blog

Tuesday, 25 October 2005, 8:51 AM
Infinite Crisis and a trumped-up conflict
Infinite Crisis (IC from hereon) is this year's big cross-over event in the DC Universe, and meant to be as DCU-shaking as the original Crisis on Infinite Earths (with heavy echoes of same).

There have been several lead-in mini-series thus far, including:

(I'm going to take this "below the fold" so that those who either aren't interested or who don't want to see SPOILERS before the TPBs come out, can skip on.)

In addition to the above, the conflict mentioned in the OMAC saga has been raging through recent issues of JLA, Superman, and Batman. It's torn apart the JLA and torn apart as well "the Big Three" heroes in the DCU -- whereby hangs the whole Infinite Crisis tale, and my main complaint.

Batman. Superman. Wonder Woman. The triumvirate of the DCU. Now currently on the outs with each other. And why?

Batman is suspicious of everyone. It's been established in the past that he's developed plans to take out any of the JL should the need arise (which plans -- detect a pattern here? -- were stolen by a villain and used against the Justice League, natch). So nobody trusts him, especially when his latest plan -- the spy satellites -- comes to light. And he doesn't trust anyone, especially when he discovers that one of his fellow JLAers tampered with his memory, and the memories of those about him, and that some of the other JLAers knew and approved (or at least acquiesced).

Superman is ticked off at Bats for not being trusted (and for the damage his hijacked OMAC system caused).

Bats and Supes are both outraged at Wonder Woman for ...

... well, killing a man.

Um ...

Okay, the situation involved was a bit contrived. The main villain -- okay, call him by his name, Maxwell Lord (who is as unlikely a maniacally scheming villain as one can imagine, so there's a strike against the whole thing), has engineered the whole OMAC takeover. He's also been using his mind control abilities to take over Superman. And, even when Diana, in a knock-down drag-out with Supes, manages to barely subdue him (her magical tiara cutting a nice swathe across his throat), and after Diana has Max apprehended and wrapped up in her magic lasso and has commanded him to release Supes, and he does ... Max still swears that, someday, he'll break free, and then he'll take over Supes again and have him kill everyone.

And when Diana compels Max to tell her how to stop him, and he answers, "Kill me," she does. Snaps his neck, right there.

Now, it was a contrived situation, and one that could have been solved in various other ways with other writers. After all, this isn't the first time we've seen mind control of the JLA's heaviest hitters, and those situations didn't end in death. Heck, straightforward enough to find some way to psychically lobotomize him, or strand him on another planet, or in the Phantom Zone, or something like that.

But be that as it may, Diana makes the call, and does the deed.

And Supes and Bats are appalled.

Excuse me? Okay, Bats is unstable enough (as currently constituted in the DCU) that he can be the instrument of taking down any hero in the League, but still "draw the line" at killing. He's not entirely rational on the subject.

But Supes? I believe it is still continuity that he actually killed some folks (three "true" Kryptonians, a long ways back, but still ...), in the most extreme situation. He'd just been released from a mind control that had him nearly kill Batman, and nearly kill WW, too, and heard the promise that next time there'd be no "nearly" about it.

Shock. Dismay. Disappointment. Grief. Yeah, I could buy those. But disapproval? Parroting Bats' "there is always another way"? Give me a break. Unless Supes is still feeling guilty over what he did and taking it out on WW. But the whole breach seems unreasonable and contrived, something to break the triumvirate in an artificial fashion.

That said, it's been alternately fun and infuriating to see this whole thing unfolding. Fun to see some big stuff happening, infuriating when it pops up with key occurrences that ring false, or that get dragged out overly long (most of the Superman "Day of Sacrifice" bits, to be honest).

Lots of promises with this one to "change the DCU forever," and I suppose that's as true as is ever the case for the big events. That said, this seems to be a lot more than the Bad Guy of the Year Provokes Giant Battle across Many Titles types of events that DC has tended to do since the original Crisis "changed the DCU forever."


Filed under :: Media - Comics

Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/1.0/) from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my spouse, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.
This document's URL is: http://www.hill-kleerup.org/blog/2005/10/25/infinite_crisis.html