More miscelleny:
Filed under :: Big Business :: Media :: Media - Books :: Politics & Law :: Religion :: ZT & PC
I scored an 18 on that test also. I missed 13, 14 and 15.
Clinton wanted to take exactly this approach to abortion. Oh, how they hated him; the president who wanted abortion to be 'safe, legal, and rare' and appointed JoyceLyn Elders as Surgeon General. We are going to have to get over our squeamishness about penises and semen and teens carrying condoms if we want to take that practical 'war on abortion' approach.
Yuppers. But that "S/L/R" attitude is exactly how I feel about it.
The point of the article, though, is that we have to get beyond that squeamishness, yes, but we also have to get beyond the "abortion is just about removing a bit of tissue." That just isn't how most folks feel about it, rightly or wrongly, and so attempts to make that the driving argument as to why abortion is "okay" founder on that gut instinct -- whereas attempts to argue that the state is better able to judge than a woman what is best for her founder on another gut instinct, the sense that nobody wants to find themselves (or their sister, mother, daughter, whomever) in a situation where that personal choice is forestalled by criminal penalties.
So, just What Do You Know About The Separation of State and Church? Take the quiz and find out. This is specific to America so it'll be interesting to see how well some of you "furriners" do on it.
Like ***Dave, who saw this ...
...