This entry | Main blog

***Dave Does the Blog

Friday, 15 August 2008, 1:58 PM
Because being a baby-killer is evidently better than being a sodomite

John McCain on choosing a running mate:

IN A WIDE-RANGING INTERVIEW aboard his campaign plane this morning, John McCain said that he is open to choosing a pro-choice running mate and named former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge as someone who merits serious consideration despite his support for abortion rights. [...]

"I think that the pro-life position is one of the important aspects or fundamentals of the Republican Party," McCain said. "And I also feel that--and I'm not trying to equivocate here--that Americans want us to work together. You know, Tom Ridge is one of the great leaders and he happens to be pro-choice. And I don't think that that would necessarily rule Tom Ridge out."

McCain's comments came in response to a question about comments he made to several reporters during the Republican primary season. During that exchange, McCain was asked whether New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg would make a good running mate. McCain offered strong words of praise for Bloomberg but said that Bloomberg's position on abortion--he is also pro-choice--would make it difficult to choose him as a vice presidential candidate.

In the interview this morning, McCain suggested that Ridge would be more palatable to social conservatives than Bloomberg. "I think it's a fundamental tenet of our party to be pro-life but that does not mean we exclude people from our party that are pro-choice. We just have a--albeit strong--but just it's a disagreement. And I think Ridge is a great example of that. Far moreso than Bloomberg, because Bloomberg is pro-gay rights, pro, you know, a number of other issues."

 

So, if I follow McCain here, the GOP, and the social conservatives (and, perhaps, McCain) would be willing to tolerate someone who, by pro-life lights, advocates the killing of innocent babies, and is a supporter of a greater mass slaughter than the Holocaust (I mean, that is their rhetoric, right?) -- but if that person also is willing to accept two men or two women who want to live loving, committed relationships together ... well, that's just un-American crazy talk? 

Explain it to me again slowly, Senator ... I really don't understand.


Filed under :: Elections 2008 :: Gay Stuff :: Religion :: ZT & PC

Friday, 15 August 2008, 4:41 PM
Quoth Jim ...

Thanks Dave, very good stuff...perhaps one day people will understand the facts and use reason when electing people...

Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/1.0/) from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my spouse, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.
This document's URL is: http://www.hill-kleerup.org/blog/2008/08/15/because_being_a_babykille.html