A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me A pic of me
***Dave Does the Blog

The Post

« Previous  •  FRONT PAGE  •  Next »

Friday, 11 January 2008, 11:32 AM
Paystub

So they always say you should examine your first paystub of the year carefully -- especially if you get yours electronically -- to make sure that new benefits and deductions are all being done correctly.  Since my group gets intimately involved in the benefits programming and the general goofiness of working with benefits vendors, I can certainly echo that recommendation strongly.

So I got a bit of a frisson of OMG! when I pulled the electronic paystub site my company has and saw that my pay for the first two weeks of January was lower than it was the last two weeks of December.  Yikes!

Fortunately, it was just because I had maxed out my Social Security contributions last year, so they were starting up again as of this paycheck.  All else is well.  But that's excitement I don't need on a Friday.


Filed under :: Job Jollies
Link · Print · Edit · TR/G


« Previous  •  FRONT PAGE  •  Next »


Pings?

Trackback ping address: http://www.hill-kleerup.org/blog/mt4/080510t.cgi/21179

Comments?

Friday, 11 January 2008, 12:58 PM
Quoth steve ...

My favourite paystub gaffe was a triple-threat: it was my first massive overtime cheque paid out by direct deposit for the first time including my very first raise.

My salary jumped from $7 to $8 an hour, which was great at the time but paltry to what showed up on that triple-threat pay stub: $87/hour!

The kicker was that when I went to Payroll, I didn't go to point out the error in the pay rate, but to complain at what I thought was a lower total. You see, I didn't notice how many digits were on the left of the decimal point - I was expecting three digits, so I saw three digits and complained when the numerals were lower than I expected.

(This may explain why I'm not the accountant in the family.)

Friday, 11 January 2008, 1:34 PM
Quoth *** Dave ...

Ha!


Speak!

Note: This comment space is for discussion of the above topic, and not for unsolicited commercial links. I use SpamLookup and TinyTuring text CAPTCHA to filter out comment spam. If you have technical problems with these measures, please . With or without TypeKey, you'll need to specify an e-mail address, which will not be published or otherwise abused.




Remember you next time?

Subscribe to this post (e-mail when updated)?





Creative Commons License
Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my wife, my friends, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.