If passport files for folks like Obama, Clinton, and McCain are subject to casual (for fun? for political reasons?) unauthorized perusal by government employees, officials, contrators, whatever -- in some cases the notification taking months to come to senior officials official attention -- then why should we trust that any of our data will be "safe" or "secure" or "tamper-free" or "protected from unauthorized access"?
Any time someone makes those promises about a Big Government Database (be it passports, homeland security, medical records, whatever), remember that.
Not that such databases don't have some value, or that we shouldn't necessarily have them, or that we can't work to minimize those risks. But unrealistic promises and iron-clad assurances and paternalistic head-patting should be laughed at any time provided. The risks are real, and should be addressed as such, not simply dismissed from the discussion and debate.
Filed under
::
Hi-Tech
::
Homeland Security
::
Politics & Law
Link
· Print
·
Edit
· TR/G
« Previous • FRONT PAGE • Next »
Note: This comment space is for discussion of the above topic, and not for unsolicited commercial links. I use SpamLookup, optional TypeKey registration, and mandatory TinyTuring text CAPTCHA to filter out comment spam. If you have technical problems with these measures, please . With or without TypeKey, you'll need to specify an e-mail address, which will not be published or otherwise abused.
Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my wife, my friends, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.
