THESE MAKE ME SAD
THESE MAKE ME THOUGHTFUL
THESE MAKE ME HAPPY
Filed under
::
Food & Drink
::
Gaming
::
Health
::
Hi-Tech
::
Homeland Security
::
Media - Movies
::
Media - Music
::
Parenting
::
Politics & Law
::
Potpourri
::
Religion
::
Religion - My Parish
::
Travel
::
Writing and Language
::
ZT & PC
Link
· Print
·
Edit
· TR/G
« Previous FRONT PAGE Next »
I'm glad to see the Barbarian (Defender?) making its way forward, now we just need the Monk (Striker!) and Bard (Controller? . .Wizards need a little companionship) . . . .
On other notes: as part of my daily job I'm looking into Green Energy alternatives for all the buildings we control. This summer I attended a conference on Small Wind Power. One of the most interesting things I learned is that urban environments are TERRIBLE for producing wind power. We've all experienced the wind tunnel effect in city streets, but at the rooftop level the surrounding buildings create such tremendous sheer that almost all of the usable velocity is lost in random swirling.
There's some (faint) hope that turbines like that you linked to may address some of that, but at the end of the day the best location for wind equipment is open air areas with wide expanses of flat or gently rolling landscape with minimal trees.
There is an ongoing urban wind study being done in london right now. Most of the urban turbines have very low useage, or have been turned off/removed due to quality of life issues (noise/vibration). Bottom line is that a single turbine in the country at less that 30' height was producing more energy that all the urban turbines together.
I applaud people wanting to ad wind power, but the cities are custom made for Photovoltaics. All those roofs, every one of them should have a 'sunflower' style panel on it that follows the sun throughout the day.
Go green energy! (I have a coworker who has been off the grid at her home for over 20 years . . ..)
The Barbarian is evidently a melee striker -- big hits, big damage, big mobility.
I'd agree with the prospect for wind turbines vs solar in cities. Suburbs, though, would seem a good prospect -- much lower profiles. More trees, to be sure, but we get plenty of wind at our house.
No doubt! The suburbs should have solar and wind. I'm waiting to hear more about the new PV roof shingles, but the turbines should pop up like mushrooms!
I have been enamored with the PV shingles for years. I am glad our current roof has held on for a long as it has. Maybe when we finally replace it we can take advantage of the PV shingles. Because really, why wouldn't you exploit the fact that Denver has more sunny days than San Diego or Miami. Also, I don't care if it's ugly I love the solar farm they are building at DIA. In my eyes it is much more attractive than the "Demon Horse".
Note: This comment space is for discussion of the above topic, and not for unsolicited commercial links. I use SpamLookup, optional TypeKey registration, and mandatory TinyTuring text CAPTCHA to filter out comment spam. If you have technical problems with these measures, please . With or without TypeKey, you'll need to specify an e-mail address, which will not be published or otherwise abused.
Original material on this weblog is available under a Creative Commons License from
The views expressed by me on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of
my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my wife, my friends, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs.